Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in UniformNew Foto - Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformoriginally appeared onParade. A sweet picture ofTaylor Swiftin her full Brownie regalia is making the rounds online after a local branch of the Girl Scouts of the USA posted it online. The Girl Scouts of Michigan dug up the rare childhood photo of the superstar to celebrate the news thatshe'd bought back the rights to her first six albums, posting the sweet snap alongside one of the ones the "Karma" songstress posted to mark the occasion, which showed her sitting crosslegged on the ground with vinyl copies of her reclaimed works spread around her in a semicircle. The throwback photo found a much younger Swift, likely between the ages of seven and nine, wearing a Brownie vest labeled for the Girl Scouts U.S.A. Great Valley troop, which links back to Eastern Pennsylvania—where she grew up. She posed next to another blonde little girl who proudly showed of her patches on a sash that also showed their troop number: 665. "When Girl Scouts set their minds to something, there's no limit to what they can achieve. With courage, confidence, and character, we're building a generation that knows their worth—just like Taylor Swift reclaiming her masters," the organization wrote alongside the snapshots. Many tagged their fellow Swifties in the comments of the post, eliciting many emojis and "aws" in response. "omg even the Girl Scouts are team swift," one fan said in surprise, with the Michigan branch agreeing, "100% !!" "So proud!!" someone else gushed. "Make new friends, but keep the old. One is silver and the other's gold," another quoted a song frequently sung by Girl Scouts, likening it to one of Swift's lyrics: "Just like the single thread of gold that ties me to you!" Related: Taylor Swift Fan Goes Viral for Incredibly Relatable Reaction to Spotting Singer Looking 'Flawless' While Out to Dinner in New York City Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformfirst appeared on Parade on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformorigina...
Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hotNew Foto - Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot

Sydney Sweeneyis a Hollywood supernova, making a dizzying amount of moves professionally, yet social media is consumed with the superficial. She's using it to her advantage. Look no further than theannouncementthat theAnyone but Youstar's brand partnership with men's bath product Dr. Squatch will now include a limited edition line of soap bars infused with her bathwater. Sweeney said the idea was born from "dirty little boys" who "wouldn't stop asking" for it after she first partnered with the company last year for asultry campaign shot in a bubble bathtub. She's not exaggerating: A comment from theoriginal Instagram adfrom October 2024 asking, "how much for the water," has nearly 40,000 likes. Dr. Squatch called Sweeney "a legend" for agreeing to create the bathwater soap, which the brand says smells like "morning wood." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Dr. Squatch (@drsquatch) Sweeney's either a genius or desperate, according to social media. While we won't make that call, we'll observe that there is such digital discourse around her — her beauty, her body and especially her love life. So who could blame the actress, who's been praised as"business-minded" and "ambitious"by herAnyone but Youcostar Glen Powell fororchestrating theirfauxmanceto market their hit rom-com, for taking it to the bank? Sweeney is a studio moneymaker. The films she acted in, as of press time, have earned $244,399,399 worldwide, according tothe Numbers. She's also a storytelling mover and shaker through her production company, Fifty-Fifty Films, which she cofounded in 2020 with her producing partner and former fiancé Jonathan Davino. The films she's produced have made $243,952,681 worldwide. Yet her love life drives much of the conversation around her. Sweeney chose not to even confirm her reportedbroken engagementfrom Davino in 2025 — and yet that consumed the Q1 gossip cycle. The fact that they still hang out and work together has only fueled the web talk. The bigger story has become who she'll date next. Social media went cray-cray when, after her Davino split, she attended Powell's sister's wedding. Had the costars coupled up?Apparently no.But the idea that thissmoldering movie scenecould be reality just wound up the masses. There was yet another fervor when Sweeney wasclose-talkingwith her costar inThe Housemaid, Brandon Sklenar, at Stagecoach in April. Just talking to her formerDownfalls Highcostar Machine Gun Kelly andWhite Lotusactor Patrick Schwarzenegger at a Las Vegas party in May led to a"flirty threesome" headline— among other suggestive gossip. She can't even stand next to a man without a flurry of innuendo. Social media isn't just obsessed with Sweeney's love life; there's plenty more trivial chatter to go around. Almost as soon as she broke through in Hollywood,discourse about her looksandbodybegan. In December, trollsposted cruel commentsafter she muscled up to playboxer Christy Martin. It's not just the random keyboard warriors having their say. Veteran film producerCarol Baum saidthat Sweeney is "not pretty" and "can't act" and calledAnyone but You"unwatchable." In response,Sweeney called Hollywood's "womenempowering other women" movement a facade. She also let her style make a statement, mock apologizingfor having "great tits." Why are people so shallow when it comes to Sweeney? Turns out, it's an age-old formula of stardom plus gender. "When the concept of Hollywood stardom first emerged in the 1910s, much of the original discourse focused on actors as picture personalities, which meant that fan culture focused on the various onscreen roles actors had played," Claire Sisco King, Vanderbilt University's associate professor and chair of Cinema and Media Arts, tells Yahoo Entertainment. "Pretty quickly, however, this discourse began to focus as much on the private lives of stars as it did on their work," as fan magazine coverage began to extend to the love lives of stars in the 1920s. Now, 100 years later, that coverage has not only persisted but also intensified due to the rise of reality TV coupled with the boom of social media, which has "created heightened audience expectations of access to and intimacy with famous people," King says. There is a more critical lens on females than males, "which is in keeping with traditional gender norms in our culture," King says. "While it has been historically acceptable for men to have professional lives and to be associated with the public sphere, U.S. culture still tends to expect that women be tied to concepts of home, family and love. Discourse about Hollywood often insists that women be attached to men in adherence with these traditional gender norms." It's common for internet culture "to fixate on the romantic lives of famous women," King says, "and the treatment of Sydney Sweeney is in keeping with these patterns. Such emphasis especially applies to women who are constructed as 'bombshells' because so much of their persona becomes attached to their perceived attractiveness and appeal as objects of desire for heterosexual men." When it comes to Sweeney being connected to her romantic leads, that's also typical because it "helps to preserve the fantasy that audiences enjoy when they watch fictional love stories that feel as if they could be real." Sweeney wisely leaned in on that fantasy withAnyone but Youwhen she and Powell pretended there could be something going on to help market the movie. That waspart of the film's success. But female actresses walk a fine line. Anytime women take roles that are outside the box we see them in, people view it "as a kind of betrayal," says King. For Sweeney, "An example of this inverse perspective [is] when many fans — especially men — expressed dislike at the change in her appearance while shooting the Martin biopic." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sydney Sweeney (@sydney_sweeney) While the social media noise blasts, Sweeney is methodically plotting her career — and building up her bank account. Just a handful of film projects she has slated are starring roles: the Martin biopic, a screen adaptation of the video gameSplit Fiction, the psychological thrillerThe Housemaidand along-awaitedBarbarellaremake. As she did withAnyone but You,she will again double-dip and produce all four. Sweeney has talked about beinghands-onwhen it comes to producing projects, saying she kept Sony's marketing team "awake at night because I couldn't stop with ideas" aroundAnyone but You.She said she was on every call and in text group chats. With the confidence of a seasoned Hollywood player, Sweeney said she accepts roles — like in 2024'sdisappointing-and-she-knew-itMadame Web— as a "building block" in getting her own projects made. "Everything in my career I do not just for that story, butstrategic business decisions," she said. "Because I did that, I was able to sellAnyone but You[and] getBarbarella." Sweeney's business sense extends to money management. She's called herself a"huge saver,"explaining, "I don't just go and spend money. I like to invest. I like real estate. I like making, hopefully, smart choices with the money I'm making." There's a personal reason behind that: Sweeney'sparents went through bankruptcywhen she was young. Despite her stardom, she worries abouthow much money she has going in and out. She's said that if she didn't take brand partnerships — like Dr. Squatch but also beauty (Laneige) and fashion brands (Miu Miu) — on the side,she couldn't pay her bills. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sydney Sweeney (@sydney_sweeney) Sweeney's business acumen has been praised by not just her costars but also by executives and collaborators. Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group head Tom Rothman called her a"force of nature"and said the studio is lucky to be in business with her. Jessica Goodman, whose YA novelThey Wish They Were Usis being adapted into a series by Sweeney, called her"very savvy"with an ability "to get things done in a way that might surprise people." Jennifer Millar, Sweeney's talent agent for over a decade, has said,"From the beginning she knew what she wanted.She knew how she was going to get there, and she's been doing it." Sweeney is, after all, the same girl who, at 12, made aPowerPoint presentationto convince her parents to allow her to pursue acting. Her pitch worked and has paid off. It's paying off again as she turns leering comments into a money-making brand campaign for soap, which has resulted in her very own product. And people are lapping it up.

Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot

Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot Sydney Sweeneyis a Hollywood supernova, making a dizzying amount of moves professionally, yet s...
Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thrillerNew Foto - Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller

WHITE PLAINS, NY – Most former presidents write memoirs after they leave the White House. Former PresidentBill Clintonhas been there, done that. First on his literary agenda now? Writing political thrillers. Clinton is a thriller reader himself, but more than that he just really wanted a chance to work with bestselling authorJames Patterson.Their third novel, "The First Gentleman" is out now from Little, Brown and Company. Sitting down for an interview with USA TODAY, the prolific pair catch up like a couple of old friends – Clinton shares a story of tourists he spotted reading his wife's book while in Korea and gives Patterson the name of a new author to check out. "He reads everything," Patterson tells me. Both love S.A. Cosby, Michael Connelly and Lee Child. In their latest novel, the fictional Madame President Wright's husband is on trial for murder, a potential crime uncovered by journalist couple Brea and Garrett. Not only is it harmful to the White House image for the first gentleman and former Patriots player to be accused of murder, but it threatens to upend the carefully crafted economic "Grand Bargain" the president is nearly ready to announce. It's a twisty thriller with plenty of inside jobs, political sabotage and many, many deaths. Clinton and Patterson take us inside their writing process, revealing how they weave details pulled from real life with fictional characters to create the next big nail-biter. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. Question:How has your collaboration changed over three books? Patterson: I don't think it's changed. Other than, I will say, I think this turned out really, really well. If somebody's looking to read a book with really good characters and great story or if they want to find out sort of how Washington really works, I think this is really cool for either one of those kinds of people. But initially we had, it was a little bit of a problem in terms of getting the characters real. They weren't working and we just kept going at it. Clinton: We had this just gut-wrenching conversation because in the beginning, we were excited – what would it be like to write a book that was from the point of view of the first gentleman, the first woman president's husband? It had all kinds of fascinating ramifications. But then something happened while we were doing it and I realized we hadn't created anybody you could like. Patterson: We have these two (reporters) and they weren't working, either, in the beginning. When people think of my writing, they go "short chapters," but the whole thing is character. Alex Cross is, in my opinion, a great character. Lindsay Boxer is a really good character. The characters in "First Gentleman," there are four of them, are really good characters, and that's the key. Obviously (Clinton) was key in terms of making those characters work, especially in the White House. Clinton: People (in the White House) struggle to maintain some measure of normalcy, however they define it. Even though you have to be ambitious to be elected president and disciplined to execute the job, you're still a person. We all react differently to different things that happen. So we try to capture that. Patterson: The humanity. I wish we could get back to the understanding that whatever party you're with, (we are) human beings. I'll give you one quick example: Last year, the president called the house and my wife and he said, put it on (FaceTime). And there he was with his grandkids, and he was in a tiger suit with only his face showing. Human being! Right, and in this book, allthe first gentlemanwants to do is go on a run with no one bothering him. Patterson: President Clinton used to go on runs. Clinton: I went running every morning for years. I still have the M&M's box that I was given by the head of my security detail on my 100th run when I was president. I loved it. Patterson: Once M&M's get 20 years old you don't eat them anymore. Are there any other signature Clinton White House details that made it into the book? Patterson: You have a relationship with a man and a woman, and obviously, it would've been possible at one point for President Clinton to be the first gentleman. Clinton: It's the only job I ever wanted that I didn't get. Is that why you chose to make a female president in this book? Clinton: I had thought a lot about, long after I left the White House and Hillary was running, and I thought about it. This character, he and his president wife, they're closer to the age Hillary and I were when we actually served. So I was thinking about, even though he was a pro football player and macho guy, he was really proud of his wife. He wanted her to succeed. He wasn't threatened by her being president, but he could be threatened by people making certain assumptions about him, like he was a dumb jock, which he's not. Patterson: But is he a murderer? Clinton: We keep that hanging a long time. In the book, President Wright is trying to pass legislation to address Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare. How did you come up with the "Grand Bargain"? Clinton: I knew what the drivers of the debt are and what the politics pushing against real change are, and so I tried to think of the things we could do to get it under control that would be the most bearable, both for people and politically. Patterson: It's a fascinating thing. How do you solve the problem with Social Security and Medicaid? And there is, you know, there's in the book, there is a solution. It's complicated, which is kind of cool. You don't hear anything (today), about, well, how do we solve these problems? I'd like to hear that right now. Yes, there is a problem. Clinton: Medicaid pays for about 40% of all childbirth and pays for an enormous percentage of senior citizens' health care and a lot of other stuff. It's really important. Sothis bill that's just been presentedcuts Medicaid in order to help pay for a tax cut for millionaires and billionaires. In all respect, (Patterson) and I don't need a tax cut. We'd rather have people with health care. So these are choices, and unless people understand that these choices are being made, they can't know clearly whether they're against or for whatever's being proposed. Patterson: This lays out that there is an alternative to that which makes sense and we don't have to cut things off for people who really need help. What was it like crafting fictional presidential addresses? Clinton: I imagined what I would say if confronted with the challenges she was confronted with. If you really want to change something, people like to hear about it in speeches and imagine it, but it almost always requires a mind numbing, detail-written piece of legislation – not always, but mostly. So, I tried to figure out how to sell it in the speech and describe how complicated the legislation would be without putting people to sleep. I found it difficult, but I think it's important, because one thing I learned the hard way is if you can't explain it, you can't sell it, and if you can't sell it and it's hard, you're going to get creamed. The problem we describe is something like what really exists today. Except today, it's in many ways more severe. It's just that our economy has been, for the last 20 years, or now 30 years, stronger than any other one in the world. Patterson, were there any details about the presidency or White House that Clinton added that surprised you? Patterson: A lot of little things. I might set a scene and he'd go: "It can't happen in that room. That room is so small, there's not room for three people in that room." And anytime it pops up: "The Secret Service wouldn't act like that. They would act like this." A lot of the thriller writers that we all like, they just make stuff up. When you're working with a president, you just can't make it up, because he'll go: "No, it wouldn't work that way. Here's how it could work." One of the beauties of this book, and the three that we've done, is that it's a really good story with really good characters, but it's also authentic. Did you have a favorite character to write? Patterson: Favorite character for me is Brea – she just develops, she gets stronger and stronger for a lot of reasons, and there is one big twist in there, and that really propels her as a character. Clinton: I agree with that, and one of the reasons I liked her is that she's smart and brave and good and honest, but in the beginning of the book, she thinks something that's very wrong about a big issue, and when she knows she's wrong, she turns on a dime and does the right thing. You don't see that much in Washington. Patterson: Or in general. Clinton: There are people that think that you never admit error. You accuse other people of doing what you're doing, and you roll along. The worst thing you can do is admit that she made a mistake. I like her because she's playing in the big leagues − her whole life is on the line, and she still does the right thing. Patterson: We've sold this in Hollywood and ... the production companies go, "Well, maybe we should cast (First Gentleman) Cole." I'm going like, no, you better cast Brea, because Cole, he's a good character, but Brea, she's real, and Garrett, her partner, they are really key characters. And the president herself, but Cole, eh, I don't know. Not as big a character. Who would be your dream actor to play her?(Brea, the protagonist, is Black). Patterson: There's so many. I mean, that's the beauty right now − one of the nice things that's happened in Hollywood, especially with Black actors, so many have been discovered. There are so many choices. What are you excited for readers to see in this story, especially fans of your last two thrillers? Clinton: I'm excited for them to see, first of all, that there's still room for citizen activism that can make all the difference in the world, from people who just want to do the right thing, like Brea and Garrett. Secondly, I want them to see that a president and her husband are people. No matter what's going on, she's still got to go to work every day. If she thinks (Cole) machine-gunned half a dozen people, she's still got to go to work. Nobody else can make these decisions. I want them to see how staff behaves, senior staff, and when they're honorable and when they're not, and what a difference it can make, because you can't be president unless you can trust them. You have to have some people you trust. Clare Mulroy is USA TODAY's books reporter, where she covers buzzy releases, chats with authors and dives into the culture of reading. Find heron Instagram, subscribe to our weeklyBooks newsletteror tell her what you're reading atcmulroy@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Bill Clinton and James Patterson talk new political thriller book

Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller

Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller WHITE PLAINS, NY – Most former presidents write me...
Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targetsNew Foto - Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets

Ukraine'slarge-scale drone attackon Russian air bases thousands of miles behind the front lines is the latest in a long line of daring missions by Ukraine's forces against its giant neighbor. The operation, more than a year and a half in the making, involved drones being smuggled into Russian territory and hidden in wooden mobile houses atop trucks, according to a source in the SBU, Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency. The strikes caused an estimated $7 billion in damages and hit 34% of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers at its main air bases, the source said. The assault also showed that Ukraine still has the ability to pressure Russia even as Moscow ramps up its own attacks andoffensive operations. Here's a look at some of the Ukrainian force's most significant hits during the war: Analysts have called Ukraine's Sunday drone attack on the bomber bases the most significant by Kyiv since the beginning of the war. More than 40 aircraft were known to have been hit in the operation, according to an SBU security source, including TU-95 and Tu-22M3 strategic bombers and one of Russia's few remaining A-50 surveillance planes. The Tu-22M3 is Russia's long-range missile strike platform that can perform stand-off attacks, launching missiles from Russian airspace well behind the front lines to stay out of range of Ukrainian anti-aircraft fire. Russia had 55 Tu-22M3 jets and 57 Tu-95s in its fleet at the beginning of the year, according to the "Military Balance 2025" from the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank. The Tu-95 joined the Soviet Union air force in the 1950s, and Russia has modified them to launch cruise missiles like the Tu-22. Military aviation expert Peter Layton said the loss of the bombers, which could carry the heaviest and most powerful cruise missiles, mean Russia will need to rely more on drones for future attacks on Ukraine. Outside the immediate air war, the attack on the air bases will be a major distraction for Russian President Vladimir Putin, said Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, now a military analyst in Hawaii. "Putin will direct more resources to internal security after such a domestic security failure," Schuster said. "Ukraine was able to deploy dozens of containers with drones to within line of sight of major Russian strategic bases and launch massive air strikes. Can you imagine explaining that one to Putin?" One of Ukraine's first major wins was thesinking of the cruiser Moskva, the pride of Russia's Black Sea fleet, in the early months of war. The Moskva was one of theRussian Navy's most important warshipsand its sinking represented a massive blow to Moscow's military, which at the time was struggling against Ukrainian resistance 50 days intoPutin's invasion. In April, 2022, Ukraine's Operational Command South claimed the Moskva had begun to sink after it was hit by Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missiles. Russia, meanwhile said a fire broke out on the guided-missile cruiser, causing munitions aboard to explode, inflicting serious damage to the vessel, and forcing the crew of the warship to be evacuated. Analysts said its loss struck hard at the heart of the Russian navy as well as national pride, comparable to the US Navy losing a battleship during World War II or an aircraft carrier today. What followed was a string of naval defeats for Moscow's Black Sea Fleet. In early 2024,six sea drones, powered by jet skis, felled a Russian guided missile ship, the Ivanovets. Night-time footage released by the Ukrainians showed Russians firing at the drones as they raced toward the Ivanovets, before at least two drones struck the side of the ship, disabling it and causing massive explosions. Built following Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, the 12-mileKerch bridgewas a vital supply line for Moscow's war effort in Ukraine and apersonal projectfor Putin, embodying his objective to bind the peninsula to Russia. Russia built the bridge at a cost of around $3.7 billion In July, 2023, Ukrainian security services claimed to have blown up the bridge using an experimental sea drone. Theattackcaused damage to the road lanes of the bridge, and, according to Russian officials, killed two civilians. The head of the SBU, Vasyl Maliuk,told CNNat the time that the Kerch attack was a joint operation with the Ukrainian navy. The bridge is a critical artery for supplying Crimea with both its daily needs and supplies for the military. A number of high profile Russian military figures have been killed inside the country over the past year. Crucially, Ukraine has never claimed the killings but it is notable that many of those killed played prominent roles in Moscow's . Last month, Russian deputy mayor and prominent veteran of the war,Zaur Aleksandrovich Gurtsiev, was killed in an explosion in southern Russia. Russian authorities said they were investigating all options into the killing, "including the organization of a terrorist attack" involving Ukraine. Gurtsiev had been involved in the Russian attacks on the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol, which destroyed about90% of residential buildings,according to United Nations estimates. Gurtsiev had "introduced his developments in the technology of targeting missiles, which allowed them to increase their accuracy and effectiveness many times over," according to the "Time of Heroes" program. In April, Russian authoritieschargeda "Ukrainian special services agent" with terrorism, after he was detained in connection with acar explosionthat killed Russian General Yaroslav Moskalik, the deputy head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. And in February Armen Sarkisyan, the founder of a pro-Russian militia group in eastern Ukraine – described by authorities in Kyiv as a "criminal mastermind" – died following a bombing in central Moscow. The bombing took place in an upmarket residential complex in the capital city, Russian state media outlet TASS reported at the time. Ukraine has never claimed the killings but it is notable that high-profile figures have been assassinated in Russian territory. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Ukraine’s drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets

Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets Ukraine'slarge-scale drone...
Trump overshadows Supreme Court as ruling season beginsNew Foto - Trump overshadows Supreme Court as ruling season begins

WASHINGTON — The beginning of June marks the start of the traditional monthlong ruling season at the Supreme Court, when the justices hand down decisions in their biggest and most contentious cases. But this year is different. President Donald Trump's second term has disrupted the court calendar, with the nine justices now spending as much time, if not more, juggling consequential emergency cases that need to be handled quickly as they do on the regular docket of cases that have gotten months of attention and deliberation. "It underscores the degree to which Donald Trump and the Trump administration are sucking all of the oxygen out of the room," said Leah Litman, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School and the author of a new book about the court, "Lawless." This can affect the public's knowledge and understanding of what the court is doing in part because media organizations are used to devoting additional resources to coverage during June that are not necessarily available at other times of the year, she added. It also changes the normal rhythms of the court's operations. The court announces ahead of time when rulings in argued cases are expected, and they are always issued at 10 a.m. But emergency decisions can drop at any time of day, with no advance notice. One recent decision was released in theearly hours of a Saturday morning. Nearly all the emergency cases are related to the administration's aggressive interpretations of federal law in executive orders that have regularly been blocked by federal judges. As June begins, the Supreme Court has 33 cases to decide out of 62 on the so-called merits docket. Those are the cases in which the justices heard arguments in the current nine-month term, which started in October, and would be expected to decide by issuing lengthy written decisions. The next scheduled ruling day is Thursday. In the meantime, the court since January has already issued rulings of some description in 11 Trump-related emergency cases via what has been dubbed the "shadow docket," and it has several others pending. These are cases in which the justices do not generally hear oral arguments, and they are often decided by brief court orders without the lengthy, detailed reasoning associated with major Supreme Court decisions. But the shadow docket decisions can be just as practically important as the cases decided on the merits docket, sparking concerns about transparency and process. Via the shadow docket, the court has already allowedTrump's ban on transgender peoplein the military to go into effect, given a green light to thefiring of independent agency members, and approved the administration'sremoval of legal protectionsfor thousands of Venezuelan immigrants. The justices have alsoput the brakeson an attempt by the administration to use a wartime law to deport Venezuelans it claims are gang members andordered Trump to "facilitate" the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongly sent to El Salvador. On Friday, the court allowed the Trump administration torevoke legal protectionsfor more than 500,000 immigrants. In the meantime, the docket of merits cases has a relatively small number of headline-grabbing cases compared with previous years. Of those cases yet to be decided, the biggest is a challenge to a Tennessee law thatbans gender transition care for minors. The court is also set to rule on aconservative religious objectionto LGBTQ-themed books in a Maryland county's schools and an effort by Texas torestrict access to pornographic websites. By comparison, last June, the court's rulings included onegranting Trump broad immunityfrom prosecution for events that took place during his first term as president, atrio of rulingsthat weakened federal agency power, a decisionupholding a lawthat bars domestic abusers from possessing guns, and another rejecting a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's approval of theabortion pill mifepristone. In the summer of 2023, the court within a matter of daysended affirmative actionin college admissions and killed President Joe Biden'sstudent loan debt relief plan. And the previous summer, the court overturnedRoe v. Wade, the landmark abortion rights decision. "The emergency docket seems to have almost swallowed the court's merits docket over the past month or so," said Greg Garre, a Washington lawyer who regularly argues cases at the court. One case he argued, concerning Oklahoma's attempt to launch the first religious public charter school, was poised to be one of the biggest of the term. But it ended up fizzling whenthe court deadlocked 4-4. In fact, some cases that arise as emergency applications have ended up being converted into merits cases, creating what some view as a "rocket docket" — that is, major cases zooming immediately to the high court instead of taking months or years to navigate the normal appeals process. "In a few years, we may no longer be able to say that the emergency docket is an 'irregular' procedure. It might become the normal procedure for all high-stakes litigation," said William Baude, a University of Chicago Law School professor who coined the "shadow docket" phrase. One high-profile example was the court's January decision upholding a law that wasintended to ban TikTokif its Chinese owner did not immediately sell it. The Supreme Court resolved the entire case within weeks after it reached the court via an emergency appeal. The court also electedto hear oral argumentsin a trio of shadow docket cases concerning nationwide injunctions issued by judges that blocked Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, in a further blurring of the regular merits docket and the fast-moving shadow docket. Some Supreme Court watchers have speculated that the justices deliberately kept their merits docket relatively light this term, knowing that there was the possibility of election-related cases in the fall and a potential wave of Trump-related cases if he won the election, based onwhat happened in his first term. "I definitely feel like the court is reserving space in its schedule for emergency docket cases involving Trump administration initiatives," said John Elwood, another lawyer who argues cases at the court.

Trump overshadows Supreme Court as ruling season begins

Trump overshadows Supreme Court as ruling season begins WASHINGTON — The beginning of June marks the start of the traditional monthlong ruli...

 

KOS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com