Armed bystander who helped confront Walmart stabbing suspect speaks outNew Foto - Armed bystander who helped confront Walmart stabbing suspect speaks out

A former Marine who helped confront the suspect in astabbing rampageat a Walmart in Michigan is speaking out in an exclusive broadcast interview after the terrifying incident that authorities said was an act of terrorism. Nearly a dozen people were randomly injured in the attack on Saturday before a group of citizens -- including Derrick Perry, who was armed with a gun -- helped prevent the suspect from leaving or harming others, authorities said. "I didn't think of anything other than trying to get him away from people and get him isolated and get him to put the knife down and just to kind of focus on me instead of everyone that was yelling and screaming in the background," Perry, a married father of three, told "Good Morning America" on Monday. The suspect allegedly entered the Walmart store in Traverse City, about 150 miles north of Grand Rapids, Saturday afternoon and began attacking people with a folding knife, authorities said. "It appears that these were all random acts," Grand Traverse County Sheriff Michael Shea said at a news conference on Sunday afternoon, adding that the attacks began near the checkout area. The victims range in age from 29 to 84 and include a Walmart employee, Shea said. MORE: Authorities were searching for Walmart stabbing suspect prior to incident A group of citizens, including a firearm-wielding Perry, confronted the suspect in the parking lot in a dramatic scene that was captured on video by a bystander. A deputy then took the suspect -- 42-year-old Bradford James Gille -- into custody, authorities said. "I commend them," Shea said of the citizens who helped. "It's not very often that we have citizens that are willing to step up and take action." Gille was formally charged Monday with one count of terrorism and 11 counts of assault with intent to murder. He did not enter a plea during his arraignment, and a judge overseeing the hearing said an attorney will be appointed to represent him. MORE: Good Samaritan speaks out after stopping couple from 'dumping' kittens in dirt field Magistrate Tammi Rodgers set Gille's bail at $100,000 cash and ordered him to return to court for a probable cause hearing on Aug. 6 and a preliminary hearing on Aug. 12. The magistrate granted the prosecutor's request for high bail for Gille, alleging that he had committed "one of the most serious crimes that one could commit in the state of Michigan." Prosecutors said each charge against Gille carries a possible life sentence if he is convicted.

Armed bystander who helped confront Walmart stabbing suspect speaks out

Armed bystander who helped confront Walmart stabbing suspect speaks out A former Marine who helped confront the suspect in astabbing rampage...
Heat maps show half the U.S. under advisories, warningsNew Foto - Heat maps show half the U.S. under advisories, warnings

About half the country is under active heat advisories again on Tuesday, affecting more than 168 million Americans, according tothe National Weather Service. The extreme heat continues in the Midwest, the Southeast and some parts of the Northeast. The heat alerts will remain in effect through Thursday in some places. Many areas have already been experiencing heat waves. Tampa, Florida, which is usually cooled down by a sea breeze, hit a record high of 100 degrees on Sunday,local media reported. Temperatures on Tueday are forecast to be in the high 90s for multiple cities with feels-like temperatures over 100 degrees — in some areas, feeling like 110 or higher. Health-related illnesses can increase significantly during extreme heat. It's advised to drink plenty of water and stay in air-conditioned rooms, meteorologists said. Some areas of the Great Plains and Midwest also face severe storm threats on Tuesday, potentially affecting cities including Chicago, Milwaukee, Denver, Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska, Des Moines and Sioux City, Iowa, and Billings, Montana. John Oliver: The 60 Minutes Interview Finding the plane used for Argentina's dictatorship-era "death flights" | 60 Minutes Immigration agent told 18-year-old U.S. citizen "you got no rights here" during arrest

Heat maps show half the U.S. under advisories, warnings

Heat maps show half the U.S. under advisories, warnings About half the country is under active heat advisories again on Tuesday, affecting m...
US to burn $9.7 million worth of USAID-purchased contraceptives rather than deliver them to women overseasNew Foto - US to burn $9.7 million worth of USAID-purchased contraceptives rather than deliver them to women overseas

The Trump administration is set to destroy $9.7 million worth of US-purchased contraceptives rather than deliver them to women overseas, following thedismantling of foreign assistance programscarried out by the US Agency for International Development, or USAID. The "preliminary decision" to destroy the USAID-procured birth control was confirmed by a State Department spokesperson, who said the cost of incinerating them would be $167,000. The contraceptives have been housed in a warehouse in Geel, Belgium. The Belgian foreign ministry said it was engaged in diplomatic talks with the US embassy to work to find alternative solutions for the supplies. The contraceptives are mostly long-lasting types of birth control, such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and injectables, a US congressional aide told CNN. It is not clear exactly when the supplies will be destroyed, according to the aide. "They have to double incinerate the products because they contain high levels of hormones and they don't want to risk leaking the byproducts out in the environment, which likely adds to the cost," the congressional aide said. "The Trump administration is quite literally burning taxpayer money." A list of the supplies, shared with CNN by another source with knowledge of the warehouse stock, shows that the contraceptives include copper IUDs, rod implants, birth control injections, and levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets. Some have USAID branding but the majority do not, according to the source's list. Most of the products expire in 2028 or 2029, with the earliest expiration date among the products in April 2027, according to the list detailing the nearly 5 million items. The US State Department spokesperson referred to the contraceptives to be destroyed as "certain abortifacient birth control commodities from terminated Biden-era USAID contracts." There is controversy about whether to describe certain contraceptives as abortifacient, or causing abortion, due to the debate over whether life begins at the moment an egg is fertilized or at a later stage. Some birth control methods, including IUDs, may work by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg. However, IUDs primarily work by suppressing the release of eggs, or by preventing sperm from reaching an egg. CNN has approached the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for comment. "Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal. No HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed," the spokesperson added. "USAID avoided an additional $34.1 million in taxpayer costs by negotiating no-cost cancellations of pending orders placed under the Biden Administration." Responding to media reports that the contraceptives were set to be transferred to a French medical waste facility to be destroyed by the end of July, a diplomatic source in France told CNN that the contraceptives were being handled by private entities and they had "no information concerning any transfers," as of Thursday last week. "We firmly support the Belgian authorities' commitment to find a solution in order to prevent the destruction of these contraceptives, so that they may reach women and men around the world who need them and are waiting for them," the diplomatic source added. "Access to quality sexual and reproductive health services and products is both a human rights and a public health issue." US Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) sent a staff member to the warehouse in Belgium as part of her effort tointroduce legislationprohibiting "the destruction of any such commodities unless all efforts to sell or donate them have been exhausted." The staffer also found that the earliest expiration date for the contraceptives was 2027, with some of the supplies not expiring until 2031, meaning they could still be used for years to come. "At a moment when the Trump administration has made devastating cuts to foreign assistance it is disappointing that the State Department would sign off on spending money to actually destroy paid-for commodities that would save lives and are waiting to be deployed," Shaheen said in a statement. "Food and family planning commodities are desperately needed in conflict affected countries, like Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo where famine is taking hold." Belgian foreign ministry spokeswoman Florinda Baleci told CNN the country was "exploring all possible avenues to prevent the destruction of these stocks, including their temporary relocation." An organization called MSI Reproductive Choices said it and other funding partners had offered to pay for the shipping and repackaging of the USAID-branded supplies, but that the US government turned down the offer. "We were not given a reason for why this offer was not accepted, but it became clear in conversations that it wouldn't be and that our efforts would be better spent finding alternative solutions to the contraception supplies gap," said Grace Dunne, a spokeswoman for MSI, which works in 36 countries to provide reproductive healthcare, including abortion services, contraception and maternity care. In response to questions about the offer from CNN, the State Department highlighted the so-called "Mexico City policy," which "prohibits providing certain assistance – directly or indirectly – to foreign nongovernmental organizations that perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning." That policy, which opponents call the "global gag rule," prevents non-governmental organizations that provide abortions, give counseling about abortions or advocate for safe access to abortion from receiving US funding. The planned destruction of the contraceptives has sparked an outcry from other organizations, like Doctors Without Border (MSF), which raised concerns about contraceptive shortages in nations that were once reliant on supplies donated by USAID. "In the communities served by MSF – whether impacted by conflict, disease outbreaks, natural and human-made disasters, or exclusion from health care – access to contraceptives is already constrained," the organization said in astatement. "Contexts that previously relied upon USAID funded contraceptive supplies are at a heightened risk of supply chain disruptions and stockouts." "MSF has seen firsthand the positive health benefits when women and girls can freely make their own health decisions by choosing to prevent or delay pregnancy – and the dangerous consequences when they cannot," the chief executive of MSF USA, Avril Benoît, added. MSF also cited reports saying that more USAID-branded contraceptives are being housed in a warehouse in the United Arab Emirates, but the organization said the US government's plan for those supplies is unknown. A State Department spokesperson did not address a question about contraceptives warehoused in the UAE. CNN has reached out to the UAE government for comment. At the beginning of July, US Secretary of State Marco Rubiohailed the end of USAID, saying that future foreign assistance programs would align with administration policies and be administered by the State Department. The rapid dismantling of USAID, led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has seen thousands of foreign assistance programs slashed, including many that focused on lifesaving work. Astudy published earlier this monthby a leading medical journal, The Lancet, estimated that the USAID funding cuts could result in more than 14 millionadditional deathsby 2030. USAID funding was most likely to reduce mortality related to HIV/AIDS, followed bymalaria, according to the study. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

US to burn $9.7 million worth of USAID-purchased contraceptives rather than deliver them to women overseas

US to burn $9.7 million worth of USAID-purchased contraceptives rather than deliver them to women overseas The Trump administration is set t...
8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding (Including One Very Surprising Guest)New Foto - 8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding (Including One Very Surprising Guest)

Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Princess Diana and Prince Charles got married in July 1981, and like most weddings, it had its mishaps Diana spilled perfume on her wedding gown and had to cover up her stain while walking down the aisle She also included a secret, 18-carat gold charm in her wedding dress It's been over three decades since the latePrincess DianaandPrince Charlestied the knot. But their royal wedding has remained one of the most talked-about ceremonies in history. Three years after they were introduced by Diana's sister,Lady Sarah McCorquodale(née Spencer) in 1977, the former couple started dating. Diana and Charles — whobecame King Charles IIIin September 2022 — were married on July 29, 1981, at St. Paul's Cathedral in London. However, according to Diana's astrologist, Penny Thornton, the wedding almost didn't happen. She claimed in ITV's 2020 documentaryThe Diana Interview: Revenge of a Princessthat Diana revealed that Charles told his fiancée the night before the wedding that "he didn't love her." Diana and Charles ultimately went through with the nuptials. According to royal biographer Ingrid Seward's 2023 bookMy Mother and I, Diana's father, Earl Spencer, may have changed her mind aboutcalling off the wedding. From altered dresses and wedding day jitters, here are eight secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles's royal wedding. Tim Graham/Getty Images Designer Elizabeth Emanuel recalled that the young bride-to-be's body changed as the weeks elapsed before her wedding to Prince Charles, and she lost a notable amount of weight. "Most brides do lose weight," Emanuel previously told PEOPLE. "So we weren't that worried when she did. She ended up with a 23-inch waist from a 26- to 27-inch." Years later, Diana spoke publicly about her struggle with bulimia during the time of her wedding. "The bulimia started the week after we got engaged (and would take nearly a decade to overcome)," Diana said in Andrew Morton's book,Diana: Her True Story — in Her Own Words. "My husband [Prince Charles] put his hand on my waistline and said: 'Oh, a bit chubby here, aren't we?' and that triggered off something in me. And the Camilla thing," she said, referencing Charles' relationship withCamilla Parker Bowles. "I didn't like myself; I was ashamed I couldn't cope with the pressures," Diana continued. "I had bulimia for a number of years, and that's like a secret disease. It's a repetitive pattern which is very destructive. It was my escape mechanism." Lichfield/Getty Images Diana walked down the aisle of St. Paul's Cathedral wearing one of her favorite scents: Quelques Fleurs. However, according to her makeup artist, it almost wore her. Barbara Daly famously revealed that the young princess, then 20 years old, accidentallyspilled some perfumeon her dress as she tried to put some on her wrists after getting dressed in theworld-famous bridal gown. Daly said she told Diana to simply hold that spot on her dress as she was walking to make it seem like she was lifting the front of her dress so she didn't step on it. Diana was even spotted trying to cover the spot where the perfume spilled with her hand as she approached the altar. Tim Graham/Getty Images Diana knew her dress' 25-foot-long train was difficult to handle and let her young bridesmaids know it. Charles' goddaughter,India Hicks, recounted the details when she and Diana's niece,Sarah Armstrong-Jones, were in charge of guiding the gown down the aisle. Hicks wrote in a May 2018 essay forHarper's Bazaarthat as Diana entered the cathedral, she told the girls, "Do your best." "We knew what that meant: If we pulled too much, straightening the material, her tiara and veil would slip," she continued. "But if we didn't pull enough, the effect of the train would be lost." Anwar Hussein/Getty Images Florist David Longman toldExpressin May 2018 that afterQueen Elizabethlost the flowers during her own wedding, she started the tradition of having two identical bouquets made to prevent a similar mishap. "We made two bouquets," said Longman about Diana and Charles' wedding. "The first one had to be delivered at 8 o'clock to Buckingham Palace. We had a police escort motorcyclist who took us all through the city to the Palace." He continued, "Then we came back, and by that time, they had finished the second bouquet, and back we went again." David Jones- WPA Pool/Getty Images Nerves got the best of Diana while she was saying her vows. Sheaccidentally referred to her groomas "Philip Charles" rather than "Charles Philip." (To be fair, his full name is Prince Charles Philip Arthur George. With so many names to remember, anyone would slip up!) Although it wasn't visible in photographs, there was a hidden good luck charm in Diana's dress: an 18-carat gold horseshoe trinket studded with white diamonds. "[The dress] was the fulfillment of her princess fantasy," wrote biographer Tina Brown, perVanity Fair."She was insistent in her demand for its puffy sleeves and floating silk, its twenty-five-foot taffeta train, its nipped waist, and its antique lace embroidered with pearls and sequins." In case of poor weather, Diana's dress designer made a parasol featuring the same lace as the dress and hand-embroidered pearls and sequins. However, the skies were clear for the big day. "It was probably a good thing. It was made of such light material that it certainly wasn't waterproof," Emanuel told theDaily Mailin August 2017. "It wouldn't have done her much good!" Despite Charles and Camilla'sdating history, she still made the royal wedding's guest list — likely due to her husbandAndrew Parker Bowles' role as the Commanding Officer of the Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment. According to the biographyPrince Charles: The Passions and Paradoxes of an Improbable Life, Charles felt pressured into his marriage to Diana and was still torn about his love for the then-married Camilla. He even cried over it the night before his nuptials. Charles and Camillainfamously had an affairduring their respective marriages. They went public with their rekindled relationship after Diana's death in 1997. The couple married in April 2005, and Camilla received the title of Duchess of Cornwall. After Queen Elizabeth died on Sept. 8, 2022, Charles became King Charles andbestowed the title of Queen Consortupon Camilla. Read the original article onPeople

8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding (Including One Very Surprising Guest)

8 Secrets from Princess Diana and Prince Charles' Royal Wedding (Including One Very Surprising Guest) Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty...
'Fantastic Four' stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby's handsy behavior raises eyebrows and movie hype: expertNew Foto - 'Fantastic Four' stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby's handsy behavior raises eyebrows and movie hype: expert

Pedro Pascaland Vanessa Kirby, whose recent flirtatious behavior towards one another has raised eyebrows, are just two of Hollywood's mega-stars who have sparked romance rumors from handsy, red-carpet appearances. Fromgentle neck rubs to hand-holding, the superhero power couple — who play Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic and Sue Storm/The Invisible Woman in the Marvel film, "The Fantastic Four: First Steps" — have been noticeably touchy with one another while promoting the movie. But Pascal, who recently admitted physical touch helps himcope with anxieties, said there's nothing more to it. Scarlett Johansson Defends Viral Red Carpet Kisses With Co-star Jonathan Bailey "I was always one to reach out when I'm facing something that is challenging or making me anxious," the actor, 50, toldMen's Health. Kirby also defended her co-star's actions. Recalling the time in which Pascal caught heat after grabbing her hand during an appearance at Comic Con last year, Kirby toldVanity Fairthe gesture was innocent. Read On The Fox News App "What happened is we were both incredibly nervous going out in front of thousands of people who love this comic," Kirby said. "He wanted me to know that we were in this together, and I found it a lovely gesture and was very glad to squeeze his hand back." However, Doug Eldridge, founder of Achilles PR, said stars often use this tactic as a way to create buzz. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "Nine times out of 10, this tactic is used as a buzz-builder, whether for the studio that financed the film, or the actors themselves, especially if the latter are up-and-comers, who haven't developed household name recognition yet. But again, there is always the '10th time' which could bring skepticism and, more importantly, scrutiny." "Pascal uses touch as a 'grounding' technique to navigate social situations, which might otherwise trigger his anxiety. Skeptics claim that's a farce, but clinical professionals have acknowledged the validity of this technique," Eldridge continued. "Wherever you fall on this particular case, the real 'winner' is the studio, as the internet has been filled with clicks and commentary surrounding Pascal, all of which creates a groundswell of buzz and potential 'butts in the buckets' for the upcoming release of 'The Fantastic Four' re-make." Steve Honig, founder of The Honig Company, told Fox News Digital that it's common for stars to use their on-screen and off-screen chemistry to their advantage during the promotional period of their upcoming project. "There are many ways co-stars can show chemistry on the red carpet without crossing the line into something that might be construed as inappropriate. The key here is to keep it fun and light, not sexual or anything heavy," Honig said. "At the end of the day, a red carpet is a place of work for actors, so the general rule of thumb is to not do anything a 'civilian' shouldn't do in their workplace." Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter "Oftentimes, the intent of red carpet PDA is to generate some additional buzz for the film," he continued. "This can, however, easily backfire and generate negative press about the questionable behavior. Red carpets are great stomping grounds for celebrities to build their brands, and they should usepremieres and other red carpet eventsto that end." "Celebrities, and their reps, need to remember that, unlike Las Vegas, what happens on the red carpet does not always stay on the red carpet," he added. "What happens at a premiere can, and often does, have a huge and lasting impact not only on the specific project but a celebrity's overall image. This can spill over to other projects, endorsements and either damage or build a celebrity's brand." Last month,Scarlett Johanssonspoke out after her red carpet kisses with her "Jurassic World Rebirth" co-star Jonathan Bailey went viral. The 40-year-old actress and 37-year-old actor made headlines after locking lips at their film's premiere in London on June 17. On June 23, the two shared another kiss at "Jurassic World Rebirth's" premiere in New York City, where Johansson's husband, "Saturday Night Live" star Colin Jost, was in attendance. During arecent episode of "Today,"host Craig Melvin told Johansson that he wanted to ask her about "this kissing thing that you and Jonathan have been doing all over the world." Melvin went on to note that Bailey was "so attractive," to which Johansson responded, "Yeah, you said it!" "Is that why we keep planting lips on him?" Melvin asked. "He's a lovable guy, what can I say?" Johansson replied. "I don't know. We're just friendly people." When Melvin asked whether she was surprised by the public attention to the pair's kisses, Johansson told him, "Nothing surprises me, you know what I mean?" Glen Powell Dodges Sydney Sweeney Dating Rumors After The Pair Reunite At Family Wedding "Nothing surprises me these days," she continued. "But, yeah, I've got a lot of love to give, what can I say?" In 2023, Sydney Sweeney and Glen Powell, who starred together in "Anyone But You," sparked romance rumors as fans caught glimpses of the two filming. At the time, the duo appeared on the "Today" show to promote the film and their friendship was questioned by Hoda Kotb, who asked if there was "a little romance" going on at any point. Throughout the interview, Sweeney and Powell shared little looks, and the "Euphoria" star couldn't stop giggling. While Sweeney laughed in response to the question about their relationship status, Powell answered: "No, but we do love each other. And, honestly, this is one of the most spectacular humans I've ever met. She's really great." In September 2021, Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain were the stars of a viral video from their appearance at the Venice International Film Festival in 2021 to promote their show"Scenes From a Marriage,"where fans noted the pair seemed to be a little too comfortable with each other. In the viral video, the two were posing with their arms around each other for photos. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary until Isaac appeared to kiss and sniff Chastain's underarm area. Isaac spoke onSiriusXM's "The Jess Cagle Show"at the time and offered an explanation for the odd sniffing by comparing himself and Chastain to flatworms. "You know, you can cut them into like a hundred pieces and they will grow a whole new worm out of the little piece. So they're basically kind of immortal, and they've been doing work at the cellular level where they're seeing that the cells kind of talk to each other through electricity and kind of decide, 'Okay you're going to make the head.' 'All right, I'm going to make the tail'…they're communicating through some sort of electro kind of magnetic situation," Isaac explained. "Maybe we should use more actual human language to talk instead of sniffing an armpit and doing things like that," Isaac said. "That's kind of what starts to happen and no matter how much we annoy each other, no matter what happens, it's like, when you get us together, it's like, it's just other stuff that's going on that is making us grow two heads." While Eldridge said the public displays of affection during press are "seldom authentic," some are truly genuine. "It is seldom authentic, but a good rule of thumb is to stay away from terms like 'always' and 'never.' Point being, Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn have been together since 1983. Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson have been married for 40 years. Freddie Prinze Jr. and Sarah Michelle Geller have been married for 22 years. Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis have been married for 10 years. Improbable and impossible are not the same thing. Just because 'most' of these relationships are manufactured, doesn't mean 'all' of them are." "It's not a question of good or bad [press], but rather inevitable," he said. "The purpose of organizing a global media junket is to drive ticket sales, but the formula is slightly more calculated than the target outcome. Again, the process is simple, not easy: build awareness, create interest/intrigue, generate a call to action." Fox News Digital's Lauryn Overhultz contributed to this report. Original article source:'Fantastic Four' stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby's handsy behavior raises eyebrows and movie hype: expert

'Fantastic Four' stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby's handsy behavior raises eyebrows and movie hype: expert

'Fantastic Four' stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby's handsy behavior raises eyebrows and movie hype: expert Pedro Pascaland Vane...

 

KOS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com