Kim Jong Un's fury after watching North Korea's new navy destroyer crippled in botched launchNew Foto - Kim Jong Un's fury after watching North Korea's new navy destroyer crippled in botched launch

North Korea's newest warship was severely damaged during a launch ceremony Wednesday, with leader Kim Jong Un, who witnessed the accident, saying it brought shame to the nation's prestige and vowing to punish those found responsible, state media reported. In a rare admission of failure, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said a malfunction in the launch mechanism caused the stern of the as-yet unnamed 5,000-ton destroyer to slide prematurely into the water, crushing parts of the hull and leaving the bow stranded on the shipway. Kim called the launch failure "a criminal act" and blamed it on "absolute carelessness" and "irresponsibility" by multiple state institutions - including the Munitions Industry Department, Kim Chaek University of Technology and the central ship design bureau. According to a South Korean military analysis, the vessel is lying on its side in the water, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) spokesperson Lee Sung-joon said during a press briefing on Thursday. Naval analysts said the damage incurred by a vessel in such a launch malfunction could be "catastrophic." State media did not immediately release images of the accident. "If the ship does not move together, the stresses will tear the hull apart," Sal Mercogliano, a professor at Campbell University in North Carolina and a maritime expert, told CNN. Naval analyst Carl Schuster in Hawaii, after reviewing the KCNA account, said he thinks the stresses would "warp the hull, induce cracks and (possibly) snap the keel depending on where the greatest stress falls." The launch failure marks a setback for what analysts have viewed as North Korea's most ambitious naval modernization effort in decades. The ship was to be the second major navy surface vessel revealed in quick succession byNorth Korea. In April, Kim unveiled the Choe Hyon, the country's first newly constructed destroyer in decades, and declared his ambition of building more destroyers and various cruisers and frigates. The Choe Hyon, described as a "new generation" warship, was presented with significant fanfare with state media saying it would strengthen naval readiness amid what Pyongyang calls rising threats from the United States and South Korea. Western defense analysts noted that the Choe Hyon marked a departure from the aging Soviet-era vessels that dominated the Korean People's Navy. While details remain scarce, satellite imagery and footage suggested the Choe Hyon could share design elements with similar Russian navy ships. Lee, the South Korean military spokesperson, said the vessel damaged on Wednesday was thought to be equipped like the Choe Hyon. Wednesday's incident could cast doubt on the country's ability to scale its navy. Kim said the damage would be addressed not only through technical repairs, but political accountability. He ordered the destroyer to be restored before the late June plenary session of the ruling Workers' Party, calling the matter one of national honor. However, considering the potential degree of damage, analysts said that it would be nearly impossible to meet Kim's deadline. Retired South Korean Adm. Kim Duk-ki told CNN that North Korea appeared to lack the necessary infrastructure – a dry dock – to launch a 5,000-ton destroyer, let alone recover and repair it. A dry dock is a basin facility that can be filled with water to float a ship or drain out to build or repair one. "Dry dock is an expensive facility, and North Korea probably doesn't have one… It's easy to repair a ship in a dry dock after draining water, but they don't have the facility," the retired admiral said, adding that restoration could take over four to five months. South Korean lawmaker and defense analyst Yu Yong-weon said rushing the launch of the ship likely led to the problems encountered on Wednesday and warned hasty repairs could cause more problems down the line. Schuster said repairs, if possible, are more likely to take months, rather than weeks. An accident investigation group has been formed, and senior officials may face censure at the upcoming Party Central Committee meeting, an account from KCNA reported. North Korea's navy is often seen as the least developed branch of its military. The hastened pace of destroyer development has surprised some outside observers, raising questions about how much of the technology is functional versus symbolic. Mercogliano, the US professor, said it's unclear whether Pyongyang's new warships even have engines as state media has provided no images of them underway. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Kim Jong Un’s fury after watching North Korea’s new navy destroyer crippled in botched launch

Kim Jong Un's fury after watching North Korea's new navy destroyer crippled in botched launch North Korea's newest warship was s...
ICE agents deploy new tactic: arresting people as they leave mandatory court hearingsNew Foto - ICE agents deploy new tactic: arresting people as they leave mandatory court hearings

Federal agents executing President Donald Trump's plans to dramatically scale up deportations haveadopted a new tactic of detainingundocumented immigrants while they're leaving mandatory court appearances. In many cases,immigrant-rights advocates say, the people being detained were expecting only a routine court check-in after being permitted to enter the United States during the Biden administration. Trump has ended many of the programs that Biden used to allow undocumented people to enter and live in the country, and ICE agents are now targeting those people for removal. "This escalation of tactics breaks down trust," the New York Immigration Coalition said in a statement. "People should be free to attend their important court cases without fear of being arrested, detained and deported outside of the court." Under Biden, many people who crossed the border without permission turned themselves in, were paroled into the country and later allowed to plead their case before an immigration court. A few were released with orders to wear GPS trackers, but many others were just told to come back to court at an appointed time. Now, in addition to more aggressively stopping people at the border, the White House has given ICE agents new powers to detain and deport people when they show up for those court hearings, as long as they arrived in the United States within the past two years. The shift in tactics has prompted confrontations between advocacy groups and ICE agents, and injected further uncertainty into the lives of undocumented people who believed they followed the rules properly. Some advocacy groups are suing to stop the process. In Phoenix,ICE agents detained more than a dozen peopleoutside court over a two-day period, May 20 and 21. Normally, undocumented people who are going through the immigration court process cannot be deported until a judge issues a final order of removal. But federal lawyers have been dropping those cases, allowing ICE agents to swoop in and detain them under the new Trump "expedited removal" process. Phoenix immigration attorney Nera Shefer said some of her clients came to court and were prepared to celebrate when federal lawyers dropped the case against them. Instead, they left the courthouse in handcuffs. "It used to be getting your case dismissed was a celebration," she said. "Not anymore. The government is given the opportunity to reprocess you under the new rules. That's what it means." Immigration-rights groups report having seen also federal immigration attorneys and ICE agents adopting the new tactics in New York, Seattle and Miami. Trump has repeatedly attacked Biden's decision to allow millions of people to enter the United States. And Trump has also repeatedly complained that it would take too long to hold court hearings for every one of those people. The administration has adopted a string of new tactics to speed up deportations, from invoking the Alien Enemies Act todeporting accused criminalsbefore they ever appear in court. "We cannot give everyone a trial, because to do so would take, without exaggeration, 200 years," Trump said in a April 21 social media post. "We would need hundreds of thousands of trials for the hundreds of thousands of Illegals we are sending out of the country. Such a thing is not possible to do. What a ridiculous situation we are in." Immigration advocates and attorneys have argued that witholding such trials is a violation of the Constitution, which guarantees due process to anyone in the United States, not just citizens or other legal residents. Trump has promised to conduct 1 million deportations annually, a dramatic escalation from previous administrations, including his own first term. Congress is considering a proposal to add 10,000 new ICE agents and double the number of detention beds. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly vowed that his administration would primarily target violent offenders. Immigrant-rights advocates say the administration's get-tough approach is also targeting people without criminal charges oreven immigration violations. Contributing: Edwardo Cuevas, USA TODAY, Raphael Romero Ruiz, David Ulloa Jr and Richard Ruelas, USA TODAY Network This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:ICE now targeting people attending immigration court hearings

ICE agents deploy new tactic: arresting people as they leave mandatory court hearings

ICE agents deploy new tactic: arresting people as they leave mandatory court hearings Federal agents executing President Donald Trump's ...
Deported immigrants, mostly Asian and Latino, will be in Djibouti for 2 weeks, White House saysNew Foto - Deported immigrants, mostly Asian and Latino, will be in Djibouti for 2 weeks, White House says

A flight with eight immigrants that left Texas this week, reportedly headed for South Sudan, will now remain in the East African country of Djibouti for two weeks to comply with a court order, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday. During a briefing, Leavitt placed blame on the U.S. District Court Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts,following a hearing Wednesdayafter eight people from Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, Mexico and South Sudan had been deported to a third country. Lawyers had said the flight was headed for South Sudan, but the Department of Homeland Security says it won't confirm. Murphy had said in the hearing the Trump administration was in violation of a previous injunction that prevented people from being sent to countries other than their own without opportunities to voice their fears of torture or persecution, or without proper notice ahead of time. Murphy ordered that the individuals be provided legal counsel and an opportunity to raise their fears. He also ordered the deportees to be given at least 15 days to reopen immigration proceedings and challenge their deportation in the event the government still aims to send them to a third country. Leavitt said Murphy's order was an attempt to "bring these monsters back to our country." "Now Judge Murphy is forcing federal officials to remain in Djibouti for over two weeks threatening our U.S. diplomatic relationships with countries around the world and putting the agents' lives in danger by having to be with these illegal murderers, criminals and rapists," Leavitt said. Leavitt, who stated the names and criminal records of the eight people who are on the flight, called Murphy's order a "massive judicial overreach." "He cannot control the foreign policy or the national security of the United States of America, and to suggest otherwise is being completely absurd," she said. Murphy had relayed the sequence of events leading to the deportations, saying the immigrants were notified of their destination "sometime in the evening" Monday, outside business hours. He added that they left the Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility en route to a nearby airport the next morning at 9:35 CT. Without sufficient time to consult an attorney or family members, the judge said, it was impossible for the immigrants to challenge their deportations to a third country. "The department's actions," Murphy said, "are unquestionably violative of this court's order."

Deported immigrants, mostly Asian and Latino, will be in Djibouti for 2 weeks, White House says

Deported immigrants, mostly Asian and Latino, will be in Djibouti for 2 weeks, White House says A flight with eight immigrants that left Tex...
Taylor Swift No Longer Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni in Surprise Reversal for Blake Lively Legal DisputeNew Foto - Taylor Swift No Longer Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni in Surprise Reversal for Blake Lively Legal Dispute

Gotham/GC Images; Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty; John Nacion/Variety via Getty Blake Lively's rep confirmed May 22 that the subpoena sent to Taylor Swift was withdrawn by Justin Baldoni's legal team Swift's rep previously slammed the subpoena, claiming it was a ploy for "tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case" Lively and Baldoni's trial is currently scheduled for March 2026 Justin Baldonihas dropped the document subpoena that was issued toTaylor Swiftin his ongoing legal battle with the singer's friendBlake Lively. A spokesperson for Lively confirmed the news on Thursday, May 22, saying in a statement obtained by PEOPLE that they are "pleased" Baldoni's legal team has "withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her law firm." "We supported the efforts of Taylor's team to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel, and we will continue to stand up for any third party who is unjustly harassed or threatened in the process," adds the spokesperson. "The Baldoni and Wayfarer team have tried to put Taylor Swift, a woman who has been an inspiration for tens of millions across the globe, at the center of this case since day one," Lively's rep claimed. "Exploiting Taylor Swift's celebrity was the original plan in Melissa Nathan's scenario planning document, and it continues to this day. Faced with having to justify themselves in federal court, they folded. At some point they will run out of distractions from the actual claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they are facing." Reps for Baldoni did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's requests for comment. A rep for Swift said "no comment" when reached byDeadline. Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty; Jeff Spicer/Getty; Gotham/WireImage The PEOPLE Appis now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! After the subpoena was issued earlier this month, aspokesperson for Swift released a statementemphasizing that Swift, 35, had no close connection to thefilming ofIt Ends With Us. "Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even seeIt Ends With Usuntil weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history," Swift's rep said. "The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, 'My Tears Ricochet.' Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case," the spokesperson continued. On May 14, Baldoni's attorneys also brought forth abombshell claim in a letterto the judge, alleging they had learned through an anonymous "source" that Lively had threatened to release private texts between her and Swift if the singer did not publicly support her. Lively's attorney, Mike Gottlieb, slammed the allegation as "categorically false." Judge Lewis J. Limangranted a motion on May 15 to strike the letter from the record, calling it "improper" and "irrelevant to any issue before this court." Lively, 37,first sued Baldoni, 41, who was her director and costar in the film, back in December, accusing him of sexual harassment, "disturbing" and "unprofessional" behavior on set, and a retaliatory smear campaign. Baldoni denied the allegations and filed a countersuit in January alleging defamation and extortion against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicity team. In his countersuit, Baldoni claimed Swift and Reynolds pressured him into accepting a rewrite by Lively and described an alleged meeting at Lively and Reynolds' penthouse during which the singer "began praising Lively's script. Baldoni understood the subtext: he needed to comply with Lively's direction." Baldoni's lawyers also included an alleged text exchange in which Lively compared herself to Khaleesi fromGame of Thronesand referred to her husband and Swift as her "dragons." The trial forLively v. Wayfarer Studios et al.,which will cover both lawsuits, isscheduledfor March 2026. Read the original article onPeople

Taylor Swift No Longer Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni in Surprise Reversal for Blake Lively Legal Dispute

Taylor Swift No Longer Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni in Surprise Reversal for Blake Lively Legal Dispute Gotham/GC Images; Matt Winkelmeyer/G...
Erin Andrews reveals surrogate suffered miscarriage: 'I have dealt with this before'New Foto - Erin Andrews reveals surrogate suffered miscarriage: 'I have dealt with this before'

Sportscaster Erin Andrewsis sharing an intimate story of loss. During a May 22 episode of "Calm Down with Erin and Charissa," the podcast she co-hosts with fellow sports journalist Charissa Thompson, Andrews revealed that the surrogate who was carrying her second child had suffered a miscarriage. Andrews,who sharesa son, Mack, 2,with husband Jarret Stoll, told listeners that she was at first hesitant to share the news but decided it might be therapeutic. "I have dealt with this before," she said, "but things were going really, really well. And her little heartbeat and her numbers were really good – so much so I even told you guys (her podcast team) a couple weeks ago because we thought we had such good news." Erin Andrews responds to ageistcomment that she's 'too old' for sportscaster role "I've been trying really hard to pay attention, I've just been tearing up the whole time and trying to stay focused," she said of the podcast episode. "But I'm also really, really good at suppressing my feelings and work really helps me with that. "I kind of made a promise to myself … that I was just going to be honest with people," she said, revealing this is not the first time a surrogate for her and Stoll had suffered a miscarriage. "When I was first dealing with all these infertility issues and loss … I just wanted to let other people know that we're dealing with them, that I get it and I understand,"Andrewscontinued. "And I'm going to do that again. This really, really sucks but so many people are dealing with it, so if you feel alone and you feel like a failure, I do, too. But you're not the only one." Erin Andrews opens up about new baby,'10 years of hell' battling infertility She admittedshe "didn't want to be back here in the loss column," but pressed the importance of sharing her journey and others feeling emboldened to do the same. The loss has also made her more grateful for her son Mack, Andrews said, who was also delivered via surrogate. Surrogacy,which has become more common in recent years, refers to the practice of a woman, contracted by a couple or individual, carrying an embryo to term that they do not have a biological relationship to. The processhas grown in popularity as the conversation around fertility struggles breaks from a whisper to an outspoken roar andas celebrities like Andrewsshare their experiences with surrogacy. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Erin Andrews reveals surrogate suffered miscarriage

Erin Andrews reveals surrogate suffered miscarriage: 'I have dealt with this before'

Erin Andrews reveals surrogate suffered miscarriage: 'I have dealt with this before' Sportscaster Erin Andrewsis sharing an intimate...

 

KOS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com