Analysis-Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumerNew Foto - Analysis-Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer

By Helen Reid and Francesco Canepa LONDON/FRANKFURT (Reuters) -Global retailers including sandal maker Birkenstock and jeweller Pandora are looking at spreading the cost of U.S. tariffs by raising prices across markets to avoid big hikes in the United States that could hurt sales. A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimise higher tariff costs in the U.S. But it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets like the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilise. Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact. Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the U.S., its biggest market. "Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff," said Markus Goller, partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. "A manufacturer from outside of the U.S. might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the U.S. market that much, so I will do a little increase in the U.S., and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets." U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10% on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on its trading partners. When U.S. behemoth Walmart said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to 'eat the tariffs'. Announcing price increases in non-U.S. markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump. "Obviously if your products coming into the U.S. are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the U.S.," said Jean-Pierre Dubé, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. "But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of U.S. tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then... it's kind of a shield." Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidise other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University. "Maybe a U.S.-only firm has to raise (U.S.) prices by 12%. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8% because you can play with pricing in other markets," he said. If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to minimise the economic fallout of tariffs. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of "global companies that don't make that distinction [on tariff rates] and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences." "I think we do have to watch that carefully," he said. INFLATION UNCERTAINTY In the euro zone, inflation was finally gliding towards the European Central Bank's 2% target. European companies surveyed by the European Central Bank (ECB) in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued. But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%. However, the U.S. tariffs on China - lowered last week to 30% - have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before. Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as U.S. retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell. "What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the U.S. and if that inflation comes to Europe or not," Pessina said. Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the U.S.. "There is no reason to raise prices outside the U.S. because of the tariffs," Adidas CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. "The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the U.S.." ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the euro zone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2% target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road. "In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs," Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month. While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-2022 during the pandemic. "It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID," said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah. U.S. consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7%, the highest reading since 1981. And in the euro zone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise. "If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices," said Miller. (Reporting by Helen Reid and Francesco Canepa, Additional reporting by Balazs Koranyi; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Susan Fenton)

Analysis-Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer

Analysis-Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer By Helen Reid and Francesco Canepa LONDON/FRANKFURT (...
Tommy Lee's wife admits being catfished while living separately from rocker amid marriage troublesNew Foto - Tommy Lee's wife admits being catfished while living separately from rocker amid marriage troubles

Brittany Furlan is speaking out about her rumored split from Mötley Crüe rocker Tommy Lee. On Saturday, the comedian took to TikTok torelease a lengthy videoclaiming she was catfished online by someone impersonating Falling in Reverse frontman Ronnie Radke. Her video came afterTmzreported that Furlan and Lee, 62, had been living separately. She also accused the real Radke, 41, of going public with the drama after Lee accused him of sleeping with her. Tommy Lee's Dog Attacked By Coyote Before Being Rescued By Wife Brittany Furlan People magazinereported the video also came after Radke alleged, in a series of Instagram Stories posts, that the comedian was catfished by someone pretending to be him and Lee, 62, threatened him over the situation. "Obviously, I'm in a hotel right now. I've been going through a really tough time in my marriage, which was none of anyone's f-----g business, but he's made it everyone's business," Furlan said in her TikTok post, referring to Radke. Read On The Fox News App According to the 38-year-old, she previously received messages from someone she believed was Radke at the time. Then the Snapchat user "started trying to seduce me." Furlan claimed she didn't save any of the messages because she "didn't want to be shady" and is "in a vulnerable place." "He says this isn't him. That's fine, whatever. I don't give a f---," said Furlan. She also showed alleged Instagram DMs between herself and Radke before asking him to leave her alone. "It's a catfish, cool. I got catfished. Why are you still harassing me?" said Furlan. "Why are you sending me hundreds of messages? Why are you trolling me? I don't give a f---. I unfollowed you. Leave me alone. That's it." Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Furlan went on to corroborate Radke's claim that Lee confronted him over the catfish situation. "Basically, I told my husband everything," Furlan explained. "I said, you know, I've been talking to whoever I thought this was on Snapchat — he says it's not him, cool, whatever — 'cause I'm a good person. I mean, I'm not a good person for talking to someone while married. I've been going through a lot in my marriage. No excuse, whatever." "I come clean to my husband. My husband freaks out, messages him. That's how this all started," said Furlan. On May 16, Lee acknowledged the ongoing dramain an Instagram postwith a caption that read, "Who's been catfished?" Furlan concluded her video by asking Radke to stop discussing both her marriage and the catfish drama publicly. "You've blown up my whole life on social media,"said the former Vine star. "This is embarrassing for me, embarrassing for my husband. This whole f-----g thing is embarrassing. I've been going through struggling with s--- at home. I'm in a f-----g hotel. Like, leave us the f--- alone, bro. Like, if you want people to be obsessed with you, like, I don't know, get another f-----g hobby, dude. This is just some serious narcissist s---. I'm done. Anyone can think of it what they will. All good." Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News Furlan's video was also captioned, "I've had enough. He's been harassing me for two weeks. He's been sent three cease and desists and has not listened. For the final time – Leave me alone Ronnie." Fox News Digital reached out to Lee, Furlan and Radke for comment. Radke has been adamant that it was a catfish, not him, who was messaging Furlan. He claimed that "the only reason" he went public was because Lee "will not stop yelling at me and stuff." "Imagine you grow up looking upto somebody like Tommy Lee, and then all of a sudden out of nowhere he goes, 'You're f-----g my wife,'" said Radke. "And I'm like, 'What? I have no idea what you're talking about.'" Posts by Radke and Furlan indicated that lawyers are involved on both sides. "I have to clear this up for the final time because Brittany seems to keep posting, implying that I'm the catfish," said Radkein one of his videoswhere he attempts to clear his name. "She thinks I'm obsessed with her, guys," he said. "What a delusional, delusional woman… The truth always prevails." "Guys, I'm not here to attack anymore, but I'm just asking this woman to please stop trying to spin the narrative," said Radke. "I don't care about your infidelity with your husband. That is none of my business. What I don't stand for is you literally trying to make me the bad guy. I have done nothing wrong." WATCH: DAVID CHOKACHI REMEMBERS TOMMY LEE'S JEALOUS RAGE ON SET OF 'BAYWATCH' TMZ previously reported that Furlan and Lee's split was over his alleged drinking. While the couple is no longer living together, they're reportedly still in communication. Original article source:Tommy Lee's wife admits being catfished while living separately from rocker amid marriage troubles

Tommy Lee's wife admits being catfished while living separately from rocker amid marriage troubles

Tommy Lee's wife admits being catfished while living separately from rocker amid marriage troubles Brittany Furlan is speaking out about...
'My 600-Lb. Life' star Latonya Pottain dies at 40 after becoming bedriddenNew Foto - 'My 600-Lb. Life' star Latonya Pottain dies at 40 after becoming bedridden

Latonya Pottain, a northern Louisiana woman known for her appearance on "My 600-Lb. Life," has died at the age of 40, a local coroner confirmed. The former reality TV star's cause of death on May 17 has not been confirmed but a preliminary finding suggests that it was likely due to congestive heart failure, according to theNatchitoches Parish Coroner's Office. The Shreveport woman became well-known during her appearance on Season 11 of the hit TLC show, which showcases the emotional journeys of morbidly obese patients as they lose weight through diet and gastric bypass surgery. Season 11 Episode 2 followed Pottain, the youngest of three siblings who turned to food for emotional comfort following a series of challenging life experiences. When she was 12, her mother died suddenly and her father moved away to be with another woman. She lived with her oldest sister until she turned 15 when her father co-signed a place for her to live on her own. Pottain joined the show to get help losing weight so she could walk down the aisle to marry her future husband Daune, according to theShreveport Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. She said that her brother died shortly before filming began, which impacted her ability to lose weight during the time. "I'm back with my trainer, I'm dieting and my weight is going down," Pottain told the Shreveport Times in 2023. "I'm also moving to be closer to my family so I can get my weight down and get my surgery." In February, Pottain created aGoFundMe pageseeking financial support being bedridden since June 2024 due to severe health issues and nearing her highest weight of 740 pounds. "I worked extremely hard to get it down," Pottain wrote. "My journey with weight struggles has been a long and difficult one. In 2022, I was featured on 'My 600-lb Life,' where I started at 531 pounds and worked hard to get down to 505 pounds. However, after the show aired, I experienced overwhelming backlash, which sent me into a deep depression. My mental health suffered, and I became fearful of undergoing weight loss surgery." Pottain revealed that she moved to Houston in 2023 for a "fresh start" but unfortunately found herself in an abusive relationship while coping with her father's new cancer diagnosis. "Unable to take the emotional and physical toll, I returned home to Louisiana. Unfortunately, my health continued to decline, and I developed severe sciatica nerve pain, which caused extreme stomach cramps," she wrote. "I was prescribed fentanyl, but my body rejected the medication, leading me to begin therapy. Now, I am completely bedridden and unable to get to the hospital because EMTs say transporting me would be a fire hazard due to my weight." Lacking a stable environment growing up, Pottain sought to help others in her community as a foster parent. "All my life I have taken care of young girls and helped support them, getting them through school, helping them with their kids and just encourage them and be there for them," Pottain said in 2023. "There's so many young girls that have lost both of their parents, going through what I went through as a teenager and not having anywhere to go." At the time she said aimed to found a girls group home and have an "awesome wedding." "Life can take a turn and you have to have to be positive and just remind yourself that you are special, you are somebody," Pottain said. Contributing: Meredith G. White, Shreveport Times This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:'My 600-Lb. Life' star Latonya Pottain dies at 40

'My 600-Lb. Life' star Latonya Pottain dies at 40 after becoming bedridden

'My 600-Lb. Life' star Latonya Pottain dies at 40 after becoming bedridden Latonya Pottain, a northern Louisiana woman known for her...
Five years after George Floyd's death, calls to reform qualified immunity mostly fall silentNew Foto - Five years after George Floyd's death, calls to reform qualified immunity mostly fall silent

WASHINGTON — The death of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer in May 2020 gave momentum to a cross-ideological effort to reform the legal defense known as "qualified immunity," which can protect cops even when they have violated the Constitution. Bills were introduced in Congress calling to abolish the defense. Multiple cases piled up at the Supreme Court urging the justices to intervene. Much ink was spilled. And then, nothing happened. With the fifth anniversary of Floyd's death approaching this weekend, Congress still has not passed any legislation seeking to even reform, let alone abolish, qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has rejected dozens of cases asking it to do the same. What minor changes have occurred, via court rulings or state legislative actions, have had little practical impact on a nationwide basis. For Karen Blum, a professor at Suffolk University Law School in Boston and a long-term critic of qualified immunity, the situation is nothing short of depressing. "After George Floyd, it was the first time I was actually optimistic and very positive that something would be done, no matter how little," she said. "But nothing, I mean nothing, has happened." The doctrine, first adopted by the Supreme Court in 1967, gives government officials the benefit of the doubt when they violate the Constitution. When a plaintiff files a federal civil rights claim, the defendant — including police officers facing excessive force claims under the Constitution's 4th Amendment — can get off the hook by arguing that it was not "clearly established" at the time of the alleged violation that its actions were unconstitutional. If qualified immunity is granted, the lawsuit is dismissed and the plaintiffs never get a chance to either negotiate a settlement or go to trial. In 2020, a Reuters investigation found that judges wereincreasingly granting qualified immunityat the direction of the Supreme Court. The law enforcement community strongly defends the concept, saying it is needed to give officers acting in good faith the confidence to make split-second decisions, often in extremely dangerous circumstances. The Fraternal Order of Police, a national group representing law enforcement officers, did not respond to requests for comment. Floyd's killing by Derek Chauvin, a Minneapolis police officer, triggered an immediate national debate over police violence, especially against Black men. But there had already been aquiet cross-ideological effortbefore then to reform qualified immunity, backed by such strange bedfellows as the left-leaning American Civil Liberties Union and the libertarian Cato Institute. They had filed briefs at the Supreme Court hoping to persuade the justices to take a new look at the doctrine and consider amending it — or maybe ditching it altogether. For a few weeks in the summer of 2020, as racial justice protests raged, both the Supreme Court and Congress considered whether to take action. The court quickly sidestepped the issue, declining in June 2020 to heara series of casesasking for reconsideration of qualified immunity. Ten days later, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, including a number of police reform measures on qualified immunity and other issues. But it ran into headwinds in the Republican-controlled Senate and lost momentum. "Republican intransigence was the real explanation there, and I don't see any reason to think that has changed for the better," said Clark Neily, a lawyer at the Cato Institute. Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., who was a co-sponsor of the George Floyd legislation, said that there were plans to reintroduce it during the current Congress but that he has "no confidence" it would get any traction with Republicans controlling both chambers. "We will get to a time in this country where we will pass that legislation," he said. In the meantime, courts have continued to grant cops and other government officials qualified immunity in cases involving shocking claims: Police officers assisting a paramedic in Fresno, California,held a man in a prone positionuntil he died, even after he told them he could not breathe. Police officers in Pineville, North Carolina,fired multiple shotsat a man who was complying with their orders to drop a firearm. Prison officers at a facility in Columbia, South Carolina,failed to intervenewhen two men murdered four of their fellow inmates. However, there have been small signs of incremental change. Some judges have criticized the way qualified immunity has been applied, joining a handful who had done the same before 2020. That approach has seeped into some recent rulings, those following the case law say. Chris Balch, a lawyer in Georgia who represents police departments in such cases, said the thumb on the scale in favor of officers "has lessened in the last five years," meaning defense lawyers need to be ready to go to trial. He cited aJanuary 2024 rulingby the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that denied qualified immunity to a jail intake officer after a Black inmate who had disclosed he stabbed a white man for racially motivated reasons then murdered his white cellmate. There was also a glimmer of hope for reform advocates at the Supreme Court, which in November 2020ruled in favorof a Texas prison inmate who had been held in filthy conditions. The justices overturned a lower court that said qualified immunity protected prison officials. After reform efforts failed in Congress, there was briefly a concerted effort to enact state-level legislation that would create an alternative way to sue officers under those states' laws, making qualified immunity unavailable as a defense. Although ahandful of statesenacted such laws, the campaign met withconsiderable resistanceelsewhere. More recently, President Donald Trump's re-election has in some ways sent the pendulum swinging in the other direction in the national political arena. When Trump signed apro-law enforcement executive orderlast month, he stressed the importance of ensuring officers are not held legally accountable for their actions. The order says the Trump administration will take action to "provide legal resources and indemnification to law enforcement officers who unjustly incur expenses and liabilities" and calls on officials to "strengthen and expand legal protections" for officers. Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman, said Trump's policing plan shows he is "fulfilling his campaign promise to Make America Safe Again." The administration is committed to reversing "failed policies" backed by Democrats, he added. With that political environment in mind, Blum, the qualified immunity critic, remains pessimistic there will be any major change any time soon. "Qualified immunity is here to stay," she said.

Five years after George Floyd's death, calls to reform qualified immunity mostly fall silent

Five years after George Floyd's death, calls to reform qualified immunity mostly fall silent WASHINGTON — The death of George Floyd at t...
Rubio to face tough questions on Trump policies in CongressNew Foto - Rubio to face tough questions on Trump policies in Congress

By Patricia Zengerle and Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will testify this week before his former colleagues in the U.S. Congress, some of whom have said they regret voting to confirm the ex-senator because he has not stood up to President Donald Trump. The Senate voted 99-0 to confirm the Florida Republican senator as the nation's highest diplomat on January 20, as Democrats joined Trump's Republicans in giving the president his first permanent second-term cabinet member just hours after Trump was sworn in. During his friendly Senate Foreign Relations Committee confirmation hearing on January 15, Rubio promised a robust foreign policy focused on American interests, echoing Trump's "America First" approach to global affairs. Some Democrats who backed Rubio in January have said they regret their votes, as Trump has seized more control of the federal government than any modern president, including cutting funding plans that had been approved by Congress. At the hearing, Rubio is likely to face tough questions about the decimation of foreign aid - Rubio was an advocate of such aid during his 14 years in the Senate - while slashing staff at the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development, which is being folded into the State Department. Senators are also likely to grill Rubio on Trump's plans to unwind Syria sanctions, Rubio's role in the administration's immigration crackdown, the delivery of humanitarian assistance to Palestinians in Gaza and efforts to end the war in Ukraine. He may also face some questions over Trump's suggestions that Canada could become the 51st U.S. state and that the U.S. could acquire Greenland, which have angered some close U.S. allies. COMPETITION WITH CHINA U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the foreign relations committee, said the administration's policies had made it more difficult to compete with China, noting that Beijing is increasing its spending on diplomacy and providing humanitarian aid in areas where the U.S. abruptly terminated programs. "Beijing is making the case that they are a more reliable, supportive partner than the United States," Shaheen said in remarks prepared for the hearing. Rubio has long been known as a China hawk. A few Democrats, including foreign relations committee members Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, have said publicly their votes to confirm Rubio were a mistake. Republicans on the other hand have praised Rubio, who has become a crucial figure in the Trump administration. He currently is secretary of state and Trump's acting national security adviser, as well as administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the acting archivist of the United States. Rubio is the first person since Henry Kissinger in the 1970s to hold the positions of secretary of state and national security adviser simultaneously. "When I have a problem, I call up Marco. He gets it solved," Trump said earlier this month. On Tuesday, Rubio will testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at 10 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT), and the Senate Appropriations Committee's State and Foreign Operations subcommittee at 2 p.m. EDT. On Wednesday, he is due to testify before the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee at 10 a.m. EDT and the House Appropriations subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs at 2 p.m. EDT. (Reporting by Patricia Zengerle, Daphne Psaledakis and Simon Lewis; Editing by Don Durfee and Stephen Coates)

Rubio to face tough questions on Trump policies in Congress

Rubio to face tough questions on Trump policies in Congress By Patricia Zengerle and Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Secretary...

 

KOS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com