Hunters wonder 'Am I going to get shot?' as US military takes over the borderNew Foto - Hunters wonder 'Am I going to get shot?' as US military takes over the border

Ray Trejo won a coveted permit to hunt deer along New Mexico's southern border this year, but with the U.S. Army moving in, he's worried. "If I'm hunting down there and wearing camo and I have a rifle strapped to my back, am I going to get shot?" said Trejo, an elected commissioner in Luna County, at the U.S.-Mexico border. "Hunting season is quickly approaching, and we need to know where the boundaries are." The Department of Defense has taken over an area along the border seven times the size of Manhattan, after President Donald Trump declared a national emergency due to an "invasion" of migrants. The transfer converts the land for at least three years intoa de facto military installation– allowing federal authorities to charge migrants, and perhaps others, with illegal trespass on a military base. But the new ownership has some locals worried, particularly those who hunt and hike on a landscape that is as fragile as it is vast. Will U.S. citizens be arrested if they enter the area, unwittingly? Will soldiers honor their right to hunt? Will the Department of Defense take care of the land and wildlife? U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-New Mexico,sent a letterMay 14 to Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth asking for answers to such questions. "These landscapes are not only biologically diverse but also culturally significant, and they deserve thoughtful stewardship and clear communication when federal land designations shift or change in use," Heinrich wrote. "Will hunting continue to be allowed within the (National Defense Area), and if so, under what additional regulations or condition?" he asked. "Are other recreational uses, including hiking, camping, and off-road vehicle use, still allowed within the NDA?" The DOD didn't respond to questions posed by USA TODAY regarding the future of hunting and hiking access. Hunting is allowed on some existing military reservations, according to theNew Mexico Department of Game and Fish. Hunters "must obtain permission and conditions of access directly from the military reservation," according to the website, which doesn't name the new military installation specifically. Brandon Wynn, a retired Albuquerque businessman and advocate for public land and hunting access, has hunted on military reservations before in New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado, he said; the permitting process is complicated. But this new military installation is different. "With this thing, there is no process for me even get permission that I'm aware of," he said. "It really bothers me. This means I can't go into there." The region, especially in New Mexico's rugged Bootheel, is framed by open sky and cut through by rocky mountain ranges. Hunters and hikers can find themselves hours from assistance or cell service. It's an area that historically was trafficked by drug smugglers and migrants seeking to enter the country illegally. The southern end ofthe Continental Divide Trail– the longest of the country's National Scenic Trails, running 3,100 miles from Mexico to Canada – now lies within the area controlled by the Army. A day after Heinrich sent the letter, the U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission, which manages the Rio Grande, rescinded bird-hunting access along a 63-mile strip of land in Texas, saying in a news release that it "no longer administers the land." The rural area east of El Paso, Texas, was a dove- and quail-hunting region. The land transfer from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Defenseincludes 109,651 acres in New Mexico, in Doña Ana, Luna and Hidalgo counties at the border, according to the Bureau of Land Management. It also includes another 2,000 acres of Texas borderland, according to a Department of Defense figurecited by El Paso Matters, a local journalism nonprofit. New Mexico's southern border is home to some two dozen endangered and protected wildlife species, native to that area and nowhere else, said Garrett VeneKlasen, northern conservation director of the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance. Some locals are happy about the military's arrival. Ranchers are also stakeholders and use land now under military jurisdiction to graze cattle ‒ or they did before an enduring drought made ranching unfeasible. In southern New Mexico, "most ranchers are supporters of Trump's actions," said rancher Stephen Wilmeth, who leases federal land in Doña Ana County. "Finally there is some relief." Like Trejo, VeneKlasen pulled a hunting tag this year at the southern border, where he plans to hunt Coues deer in the fall. The deer is a white-tailed species found only in the desert Southwest. "For a big, white redneck-looking guy like me, I'm sure there are going to be restrictions on what I can and cannot do," he said, adding he'd like to know what the rules are are in advance. "But I'm worried about my friends," he said. "Can you imagine having camo and a gun in that country, with an agency that has been let off the leash and the potential for people with brown skin tones to be shot and killed? That terrifies me." The newly minted military zone doesn't appear yet on the maps Trejo uses when he's out hunting, he said. "When I get a hunting tag I am doing backflips in my office because it's a real privilege to hunt," said Trejo, who also serves as southern outreach coordinator for the New Mexico Wildlife Federation. "Hunting has been important to me my whole life," he said. "It's a traditional thing. We got out on the landscape and hunted. It brought families together and put food on the table. I'm a little alarmed at the possibility of not being able to continue doing this, for my children and grandchildren as well." Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:US military takes over the border. What will that mean for hunters?

Hunters wonder 'Am I going to get shot?' as US military takes over the border

Hunters wonder 'Am I going to get shot?' as US military takes over the border Ray Trejo won a coveted permit to hunt deer along New ...
As judges block policies nationwide, Trump tests legal strategies to keep them aliveNew Foto - As judges block policies nationwide, Trump tests legal strategies to keep them alive

WASHINGTON – As the Trump administration fights tokill 40 court orders blocking policies nationwide, legal experts say the government's strategy is to break the cases apart, into individual disputes, to delay an eventual reckoning atthe Supreme Court. One expert calledPresident Donald Trump's legal strategy a "shell game." Another said government lawyers were "throwing spaghetti against the wall" to see what sticks. "Their bottom line is that they don't think these cases should be in court in the first place," said Luke McCloud, alawyer at Williams and Connollywho clerked forSupreme CourtJustice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. "They are looking for a procedural mechanism that will make it the most challenging to bring these sorts of cases." Trump policies blocked by federal court judges cover a broad swath of issues, includingrestrictions on immigration, a ban ontransgender troops in the militaryanddrastic funding cuts to marquee U.S. agenciessuch as the Department ofHealth and Human Services. The common element is that a single federal judge in one of 94 regional districts paused a policy for the entire country while the case is being litigated. Presidents of both parties have opposed these kinds of policy blocks. Barack Obama faced injunctions against Obamacare and Joe Biden's plan to forgive student loans was blocked. Supreme Court justices have also voiced concerns about district courts setting national policy before the high court gets a chance to weigh in. "As the brief and furious history of the regulation before us illustrates, the routine issuance of universal injunctions is patently unworkable, sowing chaos for litigants, the government, courts, and all those affected by these conflicting decisions,"Justice Neil Gorsuch wrotein a 2020 opinion. The unresolved question is how − or whether − presidential policies could be blocked if the Supreme Court limits or abolishes nationwide injunctions. A district judge's ruling's impact would extend to the geographical boundaries of where the judge presides. If the case is appealed to a circuit court of appeals, that could broaden the impact because circuitsspan multiple states. But Solicitor General John Sauer, who represents the administration, refused to commit, during a Supreme Court argument on May 15 that the administration would obey circuit decisions. If the justices rule against nationwide injunctions, one option for expanding the reach of specific cases would be for litigants to join together in class-action lawsuits. But certifying who gets to participate in the lawsuit can take months or years, while a policy and its arguable harms would survive. "The Trump administration wants to win by losing," said Amanda Frost, alaw professor at the University of Virginiawho specializes in immigration. "Even if it loses case after case after case, it wins in the sense of implementing his policies nationwide for years." As Trump seeks to abolish nationwide injunctions, government lawyers have argued for and against the cases becoming class actions. "I think the government is basically throwing spaghetti at the wall and looking for any excuse and any case to kick it out of court," said Alan Trammell, an associate law professor at Washington and Lee University who is an expert on nationwide injunctions. A trio of cases at the Supreme Court oppose Trump's order limiting birthright citizenship to children with at least one parent who is a citizen or legal permanent resident. Sauer, the solicitor general, urged the justices on May 15 to lift all further nationwide injunctions on the policy and argued a class action was the legitimate way to challenge the citizenship order. But Sauer also said he would oppose certifying a class action. After the blockbuster hearing, Trump urged the court not to be swayed by Democratic pressure.Trump stated in a social media poston May 16 that "THE SUPREME COURT IS BEING PLAYED BY THE RADICAL LEFT LOSERS." In another set of cases, hundreds of Venezuelan immigrants are fighting deportation under Trump'sinvocation of the Alien Enemies Act. Thehigh court ruled in Aprilthat each immigrant had to file a separate lawsuit in the region where they are detained, rather than join a class action. In a separate case involving Venezuelan immigrants, theSupreme Court has blocked their removalfrom the United States until the justices candecide whether the Alien Enemies Act, which has only been invoked during a declared war, applies to them. The Trump administration contends that the immigrants are enemy combatants because they allegedly belong to a criminal organization. Following the ruling,said in a social media poston May 16: "THE SUPREME COURT WON'T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!" The Venezuelans, accused of being members of the gang Tren de Aragua, could also potentially be recognized as a class of detainees in Texas, the court said. Requiring individual lawsuits or forcing people to prove they belong in class-action lawsuits would splinter the litigation and delay the eventual results when appeals are exhausted, experts said. "The courts don't want that. They're overwhelmed as it is," said Frost,the professor specializing in immigration. "But, of course, the Trump administration would like that. It's trying to flood the zone and overwhelm the institutions." The Supreme Court has been scrutinizing the strategy of class actions in Trump cases. A federal judge was considering a class action for Venezuelan immigrants fightingdeportation under the Alien Enemies Act(AEA). But theSupreme Court ruled onApril 7 that the immigrants must file individual lawsuits to force the government to justify their detention. Sotomayor, who dissented, called the decision "suspect" and "dubious." She accused the government of trying to hustle immigrants onto deportation flights without offering them a chance to contest the allegations, including whether they are gang members, in court. "The Government's conduct in this litigation poses an extraordinary threat to the rule of law," Sotomayor wrote. Forcing immigrants to wage their own legal battles could delay the eventual resolution of the cases at the Supreme Court. "That kicks the can down the road and it has the added benefit, from the government's perspective, of preventing a class action and enforcing this piecemeal litigation," Trammell, the injunction expert, said. "What it effectively amounts to is this drip, drip, drip approach." Steven Vladeck, alaw professor at Georgetown University, noted that in a bevy of recent court rulings, the Trump administration tried to slow down or defeat immigration cases by moving detainees.The2ndU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruledthat the case of a Tufts student named Rumeysa Ozturk should continue to be heard in Vermont, where it began, despite federal authorities moving her to a Louisiana detention facility. A federal judge in Virginia ruled that a Georgetown postdoctoral fellow, Badar Suri, could bring his lawsuit in that state rather than transferring it to Texas, where he is now detained. And a federaljudge in New Jersey continues to presideover the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student activist, despite his transfer to Louisiana. "The good news in all of these developments is that the shell games failed, at least in these high-profile individualized immigration detention contexts,"Vladeck wrote in his newsletteron developments in federal law. Justices questioned the lawyers on May 15 about how class-action lawsuits would work in birthright citizenship cases. Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh separately asked the lawyers for both sides whether the strategy would provide a remedy if nationwide injunctions no longer existed. "Is there a practical problem?" Kavanaugh asked. New Jersey Solicitor General Jeremey Feigenbaum, who represents 22 states in the case, said yes, because states can't file class actions. Certifying a class is challenging and time-consuming because participants must show they have common interests. For example, immigrant parents who arrived days before the birth of a child might not be considered in the same class as those who arrived 10 years earlier. If the high court doesn't allow birthright injunctions to all states, it would create a patchwork of disparate legal practices. Without a nationwide pause on Trump's order, Kavanaugh posed, the federal government would refuse to recognize the citizenship of babies born in a state that isn't participating in the lawsuit. Children of undocumented immigrants or tourists would be citizens in some states and not in others. "What do hospitals do with a newborn?" Kavanaugh asked. "What do states do with a newborn?" Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett asked why Sauer sought to abolish nationwide injunctions if class-action lawsuits would accomplish the same thing. "What is the point of this argument about universal injunctions?" Alito asked. Sauer said injunctions encourage litigants to shop for favorable judges and prevent courts from "percolating" over complex issues, or considering them thoroughly before they arrive before the high court. Justice Elena Kagan and Barrett pressed the government's lawyer about whether the Trump administration would obey temporary circuit rulings blocking its policies until the Supreme Court issued final decisions. "Generally, our practice is to respect circuit precedent within the circuit," Sauer said."But there are exceptions to that." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump tests legal strategies to push policies that judges block

As judges block policies nationwide, Trump tests legal strategies to keep them alive

As judges block policies nationwide, Trump tests legal strategies to keep them alive WASHINGTON – As the Trump administration fights tokill ...
Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikesNew Foto - Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes

CAIRO (AP) — Flights resumed on Saturday to Yemen's capital of Sanaa, held by the country's Iran-backed Houthi rebels, more than a week aftermassive Israeli airstrikes disabled the airport. The Israeli strikes on May 6 — a rare daytime attack — destroyed the airport's terminal and left craters on its runway, according to Khaled al-Shaif, the head of the airport. At least six passenger planes were hit, including three belonging to the national carrier, Yemen Airway or Yemenia, he said. On Saturday, a flight operated by Yemenia landed at the Sanaa International Airport with 136 passengers on board, according to the Houthis' al-Masirah satellite news channel. The flight had departed from Jordan's capital, Amman, earlier in the day, the airliner said. Three more flights were scheduled on Saturday between Sanaa and Amman. The Israeli offensive was in response toa Houthi ballistic missile that hit the grounds of Ben-GurionInternational Airport near Tel Aviv, which briefly halted flights and commuter traffic. The Houthis have targeted Israel throughoutIsrael's war with the militant Hamas groupin Gaza, in solidarity with Palestinians there, while also targeting commercial and naval vessels on the Red Sea. The attacks have raised the Houthis' profile at home and internationally as the last member of Iran's self-described "Axis of Resistance" capable of launching regular attacks on Israel. Since mid-March, the U.S. military underPresident Donald Trumplaunched an intensified campaign of daily airstrikes targeting the Houthis. The two sides reached a deal to halt theU.S. campaign in return for the Houthis halting their attacks on shipping. However, the U.S.-Houthis deal did not stop the rebels' missile and drone attacks on Israel, which in turn responded with attacks on Yemen's Red Sea ports held by the Houthis. On Friday, the Israeli military said it struck the Hodeida and Salif ports, claiming that the Houthis were using the two facilities to transfer weapons. The Houthi-run health ministry said at least one person was killed and 11 others were wounded in Friday's airstrikes.

Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen’s capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes

Flights resume at the rebel-held airport in Yemen's capital, more than a week after Israeli strikes CAIRO (AP) — Flights resumed on Satu...
Kourtney Kardashian Is in Vacation Mode While Rocking Sexy White Bikini – See Her Look!New Foto - Kourtney Kardashian Is in Vacation Mode While Rocking Sexy White Bikini – See Her Look!

Kourtney Kardashian/Instagram What's onKourtney Kardashian Barker's mind right now? "Rest, relaxation, and sunset yoga." Withnearly a month left until summer officially begins, thePooshfounder, 46, embarked on a tropical getaway with some of her friends and looked good doing so. On Friday, May 16, Kardashian Barker shared vacation photos onInstagram, including a snap of herself in a sexy, two-piece string bikini. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The Gooseberry Intimates swimsuit consisted of theSo Chic Halterneck Triangle Whitetop, which is priced online at $45, and theSo Chic Side Tie Bikini Briefs White, which cost $35. Kardashian Barker accessorized the look with oval sunglasses as she wore the beach-ready outfit on a boat ride. Other photos in the post showcasedThe Kardashiansstar doing yoga in front of a sunset with friendsPhil RiportellaandSimon Huck. Kardashian Barker shared with her 218 million Instagram followers a glimpse of her temporary residence by taking a photo of a view of palm trees outside a window and showcasing a snap of a cabana overlooking clear blue ocean water. In another image, theLemmefounder shows a view of the walkway to an area of beach chairs. She also shows a photo of a green coconut on top of a beach towel and clouds as the sun is setting. She wrote in the caption, "Rest, relaxation, and sunset yoga.🐠🥥🌅🏝️Thank you@airbnbfor treating us to this Airbnb Service. 🧘🏻‍♀️✨." Fans gushed over the photos in the comment section. Kourtney Kardashian/Instagram "We all need to have a kourtney summer 😍," one fan wrote. "Love it Kourtney ❤️," another comment read. Kardashian Barker's latest Instagram post comes a day after she markedthe third anniversaryof herSanta Barbara courthouse weddingtoTravis Barker. In a February episode ofThe Kardashians,the reality television star explainedwhy she enjoys living a quieter lifestylenowadays. Kourtney Kardashian/Instagram After she and her sisters were dressed in leopard-print pieces fromSKIMS'collaboration with Dolce & Gabbana, she said in a confessional it was "a good reminder of why I retired into motherhood." Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I'm in a taking care of my baby and kids and going on tour with my husband mode. I'm just not that girl anymore," the mom of four said. Read the original article onPeople

Kourtney Kardashian Is in Vacation Mode While Rocking Sexy White Bikini – See Her Look!

Kourtney Kardashian Is in Vacation Mode While Rocking Sexy White Bikini – See Her Look! Kourtney Kardashian/Instagram What's onKourtney ...
Foo Fighters drummer Josh Freese 'booted' from the band: 'Shocked and disappointed'New Foto - Foo Fighters drummer Josh Freese 'booted' from the band: 'Shocked and disappointed'

Almost exactly two years since he joined the band,Josh Freeseis no longer a Foo Fighter. The veteran drummer, who took over the beat-keeping following theMarch 2022 deathof Foo Fighters drummer Taylor Hawkins,announced on Instagramthe band informed him Monday night that "they've decided 'to go in a different direction with their drummer'." Freese said no reason was given. The band's camp had no comment when contacted by USA TODAY. Freese, 52, who has also played with Nine Inch Nails, Guns N' Roses and A Perfect Circle, took a tone of acceptance and confusion with his post, adding "I enjoyed the past two years with them, both on and off stage, and I support whatever they feel is best for the band." More:Live Nation's $30 concert tickets are back: Participating tours and how to get tickets But, he continued, "In my 40 years of drumming professionally, I've never been let go from a band, so I'm not angry – just a bit shocked and disappointed." Freese also nodded to David Letterman and joked, "Stay tuned for my 'Top 10 possible reasons Josh got booted from theFoo Fighters'list." After the death of Hawkinsfrom a drug overdosewhile the Foo Fighters were on tour in Colombia, the band took a hiatus aside from holdingtribute concertsin Hawkins' honor in September 2022. The Foo Fighters reemerged with Freese behind the drumsin May 2023with a tour that began in New Hampshire. While the band has again been quiet since the revelation last year thatGrohl fathered a babyoutside of his marriage, the frontman did reunite with his former Nirvana bandmates in January to perform at theFire Aid concertto benefit victims of the Los Angeles wildfires as well at February's"Saturday Night Live" 50thanniversary concert. The only upcoming performance on theFoo Fighters' docketis Oct. 4 at the Singapore Grand Prix. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Foo Fighters fire drummer Josh Freese to 'go in a different direction'

Foo Fighters drummer Josh Freese 'booted' from the band: 'Shocked and disappointed'

Foo Fighters drummer Josh Freese 'booted' from the band: 'Shocked and disappointed' Almost exactly two years since he joined...

 

KOS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com